5.01 Alarmingly, NO known telecoms industry studies or research have been conducted on the adverse effects of Radio Frequency – Electro Magnetic Fields (RF-EMF) from 5G technology. Many military studies have been undertaken since 1950s however, see Navy Medical Research Institute Military Microwave Report
5.02 PHE (Public Health England), WHO (World Health Organisation), ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) and other such bodies are all quoting outdated research and all have legal disclaimers relieving them of any liability for the information on their websites. PHE are a government body, and the government have a vested interest in 5G and its infrastructure. This constitutes a conflict of interest for PHE.
5.03 As recently as 13th January 2020 an Appeal Court in Turin refused to accept evidence from ICNIRP in a ruling on the cause of a brain tumour because of conflicts of interest (link). The Court did not consider ICNIRP to be a reliable witness.
5.04 Other countries unilaterally set public exposure guidelines up to 100x lower than the ICNIRP ones.
Late Lessons from Early Warnings: Towards realism and precaution with EMF? Gee. D. 2009
ICNIRP Guidelines: Unscientific and Not Protective Michael Bevington (2019)
IARC / WHO classs2B
ICNIRP’s opinion and guidelines are unscientific and protect industry, not public health
Carpenter DO, Hardell L, Moskowitz JM, Oberfeld G.
Evidence to parliament Dr Sarah Starkey
Starkey S. Inaccurate official assessment of radiofrequency safety by the Advisory Group on Non-Ionising Radiation. Reviews on Environmental Health 2016; 31: 493–503.
Hardell, L. (2017) ‘World Health Organization, radio frequency radiation and health – a hard nut to crack (Review)’, International Journal of Oncology 51: 405-413, 2017 (DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2017.4046).
Hardell, L. (2020) Appeals that matter or not on a moratorium on the deployment of the fifth generation, 5G, for microwave radiation
On MW radiation: Danish Legal opinion on the 5G roll out. Jensen, F.C. (2019) ‘LEGAL OPINION on whether it would be in contravention of human rights and environmental law to establish the 5G-system in Denmark’
IARC CLASSIFICATION UPGRADE RECOMMENDATION https://multerland.wordpress.com/2020/01/27/former-icnirp-member-advocates-that-wireless-must-get-a-more-stringent-cancer-risk-class/
ITRE report unpredictable signals not tested for real life https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2019/631060/IPOL_IDA(2019)631060_EN.pdf
Nasim, I. and Kim, S. (2017) ‘Human Exposure to RF Fields in 5G Downlink’, IEEE International Communications Conference (Georgia Southern University) (arXiv.1711.03683).
“To avoid hazards to health and prevent adverse interaction with high frequency fields (i.e. to prevent whole-body heat stress and excessive localized heating), ICNIRP recommends limiting the exposure to HF so that the threshold at which these interactions become detrimental is never reached.
Dr Martin Pall Response to ICNIRP guidelines
Michael Bevington of ES-UK exposes serious flaws in the WHO and ICNIRP’s claims on health, 5G and RF wireless radiation. 9pp
Michael Bevington of ES-UK rebuts ICNIRP’s claims on mobile phone safety. 3pp
Lack of Safety Testing 5G– Senator Blumenthal
Nasim, I. and Kim, S. (2017) ‘Human Exposure to RF Fields in 5G Downlink’, IEEE International Communications Conference (Georgia Southern University) (arXiv.1711.03683)