Compared with continuous-wave radiation, pulsed microwave fields with the same average rate of energy deposition in tissues are generally more effective in producing a biological response. ― “International” “Commission” on Non-Ionizing Radiation “Protection”, 1998 “Safety” Guidelines

In 1973—47 years ago—the World Health Organization (WHO) knew the truth about the harmful effects of microwave radiation. It published a document (Biologic Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation) [that] describes primarily the adverse effects of microwave radiation on neurological, vascular and cardiac systems, as well as on the thyroid and thrombocytes; it also reports that microwaves can cause Type II diabetes, sleep issues, cataracts, opacification of the ocular lens, and behavioural disorders, among others. ― Olga Sheean, The WHO Cover-Up That is Costing Us the Earth

Guidelines on exposure to electromagnetic radiation. Nazi scientist Herman P. Schwan worked at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics. He was brought to the US under Operation Paperclip and employed by the US Navy. Schwan is responsible for the current “thermal-only” “safety guidelines”, which take no account of the biological effects on the human body – testified to by over 31,000 studies – and which are therefore completely unprotective. But even Schwan “consistently maintained that his dosage limit probably isn’t safe for more than an hour”. ― Dr. Robert O. Becker and Brian Selden, The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life, p.306

All wireless communication devices, communicate at least in part, via pulsation and the smarter they are, the more they pulse. Pulsed EMFs are in most cases much more biologically active than are non-pulsed EMFs of the same average intensity, but pulsations are ignored in the safety guidelines despite the fact that almost all of our current exposures are highly pulsed. ― Professor Emeritus Martin Pall

[T]he scientific debate has been hijacked by corporate interests from the Telecom industry. … the European Commission [and] most of the member states … simply close their eyes [to] real scientific facts and early warnings. We have seen exactly the same scenario in the debate on tobacco, asbestos, climate change and pesticides. ― Klaus Buchner and Michèle Rivasi, Members of the European Parliament

Irrespective of frequency, EMF radiation can be either thermal – which the human body can sense/detect, or non-thermal – which the human body cannot sense/detect. EMFs are invisible, silent, odourless and tasteless, and it is a heinous crime against humanity that today’s ‘safe’ exposure limits are based solely on the thermal effects. ― J.G. Flynn, Weapons Expert, retired from Canadian armed forces (Congressional Briefing by physicist Dr. Ted Litovitz, 12 July 2001

If the more advanced nations of the West are strict in the enforcement of stringent exposure standards, there could be unfavourable effects on industrial output and military functions. ― Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation (Radiowaves and Microwaves) Eurasion Communist Countries, 1976. Department of Defense Intelligence Document prepared by the US Army Medical Intelligence and Information Agency and approved by the Directorate for Scientific and Technical Intelligence of the Defense Intelligence Agency

5G – this untested, new technology – together with previous generations – not only may threaten the life and health of our trees, plants, animals and wildlife, but also … entirely stand in opposition to life on this planet. ― Professor Olle Johnasson, Karolinska Institute, Sweden (Retired)

[On HAARP] All I have to do is beam microwaves up to the ionosphere … the microwaves going up to the cloud at a set angle will reflect down onto the country and if I continuously beam the wheat in this field, or the cattle, or the sheep, I can harm them or I can reduce the immune system of the plants so that they won’t be healthy and they will die, and I can stunt their growth, and I can bring economic ruin to that country. I can harm all of the animals, all the cows, all the sheep. It’s so easy to do. You only have to push a button and you can bring economic ruin to a country.― Barrie Trower, Weapons Expert

If you could ever electronically stroke the ionosphere in just the right way, which is what HAARP can do now, you can create an emotional change in a vast segment of the population, creating a lethargic sort of response or a highly energized, riotous kind of response. And it would affect a large number, maybe as many as 70 per cent of the population within the region where that signal was being generated. ― Dr. Nick Begich, Author, Angels Don’t Play This HAARP

Microwave radiation can blind you, alter your behaviour, cause genetic damage, even kill you. The risks have been hidden from you by the Pentagon, the State Department, and the electronics industry. ― Paul Brodeur, The Zapping of America, 1977

We can alter the behaviour of tissues, cells, organs and whole organisms…. you can cause up to six times higher foetus mortality and birth defects in laboratory animals, and these fields are so weak you can hardly detect them … It is known how to induce malignant diseases in human cells … and how to cure them … ― Eldon Byrd, scientist at Naval Surface Weapons Centre, USN, on MW radiation in 1986

These weapons [microwaves] are more dangerous than atomic destruction – with knowledge of the brain, we may transform, we may shape, direct roboticize man. I think the great danger of the future is that we will have roboticized human beings who are not aware that they have been roboticized. ― Dr. José Delgado, 1915–2011, professor of neurophysiology, Yale University, conducted research on mind control through electrical stimulation of the brain

Our survival depends on the ability of upright scientists and other people of goodwill to break the military-industrial death grip on our policy-making institutions. ― Dr. Robert O. Becker and Brian Selden, The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life, p.329

5G may be like a slow Hiroshima. – Oleg Gregoriev, Chairman of the Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection

What kind of world…?

  • Puts profit before people, the planet and prosperity?
  • Rejects the kind of science that makes sense of our biology and keeps us safe?
  • Forces young schoolchildren to be exposed to high levels of microwave radiation?
  • Penalizes teachers for trying to protect themselves/their students from WiFi radiation?
  • Dismisses the physical suffering of millions of global citizens with microwave sickness?
  • Has governments that refuse to acknowledge or talk to their constituents about the wireless technology deployed without their consent and without limits, monitoring or control?
  • Employs industry-biased/-funded ‘experts’ to downplay the dangers of wireless technology?
  • Fails to advise the public of the dangers identified by the telecoms industry itself?
    What kind of World Health Organization condones worldwide harm in favour of industry?

― Olga Sheean, World Health Organization: Setting the Standard for a Wireless World of Harm

The exponential rise in public exposure to electromagnetic radiation is putting the future of humanity at great risk. History shows that from the very beginning the UN and its sister organizations have been ideologically and financially driven by the same interests who have taken control and monopolized our fundamental needs without a care for life on Earth. This violates everything the UN supposedly stands for and the spirit of the treaties emanating from the organization as understood by the public. The UN is indistinguishable from Orwell’s Big Brother. ― Planetary Association for Clean Energy, submission to United Nations Human Rights Council, 2019