The ONE WORD project, led by Telet, will provide the City of Bath with a new 5G network utilising around 24 small cells deployed in the central area. The project will build new Open RAN systems integration and will focus on testing how the network copes with “High Demand and Dense” environments.
5G ? You’re having a Bath
On November 13th, the 5G pilot ONE WORD will demonstrate how 5G SA small cells can provide high capacity without being an environmental eyesore.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/5g-youre-having-a-bath-tickets-1028929424607
Please also come along and have your say:
A rally was held on July 7th to protest the lack of consultation and transparency over this trial. BATHNES are denying our right to be consulted and protected from untested exposures.
October 2024: we have had a second refusal to issue the ISO non compliance report, so we have gone back again and asked for contracts and reminded them of ‘principles’ in an agreement between DSIT and all members of the consortium including BATH NES. There are five principles we assume they have accepted formally which they have to comply with which re-enforces the importance of the NCR and the evidence.
So in a corner they are, let them try and wriggle this time!
This is link to the application the council made to themselves for the trials:
https://www.bathnes.gov.uk/webforms/planning/details.html?refval=24%2F01855%2FCLPU#documents_Section
EVIDENCE
Here are 3 important webinars about environmental effects:
This critique paper thoroughly debunks the claims made in the paper used by the government and Telecoms to support their claim that 5G is safe:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41370-022-00497-8
Michael Bevington reported on 5G adverse health effects ‘in situ’ studiesin 2023:
Health Concerns of 5G and Setting Suitable Restrictions, he concludes :
‘5G, like some other technologies, was deployed ahead of actual health studies. Health evidence, including six case reports of 2023, now shows that 0.06 μW/m2 (0.005 V/m) is a suitable interim non-thermal restriction and needs to be set by public regulators.’
Here are three webinar recordings of lectures presented at the Royal Society of Medicine in London last summer.
https://icbe-emf.org/activities/webinar-june-14-2023/
We recommend all recommend all three recordings on the page.
In webinar 1 David Gee gives a very useful context of the history of environmental toxinson text of the history of environmental toxins & Dr Erica Mallery Blythe logically and clearly presents scientific argument and medical evidence as to why the ICNIRP guidelines are not protective.
In webinar 2 Dr Kent Chamberlain demonstrates why at least a 500m setback from masts is justified by current science.
In webinar 3 Professor Lin, who is an ex-ICNIRP member, shares his reasoning why ICNIRP guidelines cannot be relied upon to protect public health, especially of children.
This ICBE paper is a detailed paper on the state of the science and ICNIRP’s false assumptions about safety.
Wi-Fi is an important threat to human health Dr Martin Pall, Washington State University
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323998588_Wi-Fi_is_an_important_threat_to_human_health
This milestone is important in regard to the recognition of EHS :
Press release https://phiremedical.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/phire-2022-press-release-hm-courts-and-tribunals-service-ehcp-for-uk-child-with-ehs.pdf. regarding ‘Parents have now won a 5 year legal battle against 2 local authorities to have their child accommodated in school for EHS. They won in the Upper Tribunal, thus the ruling is also precedent setting. We believe this is the first case in the world where a government body is legally mandated to make low-EMF educational provisions to accommodate a child with EHS.
Phiremedical consensus statement
